Federal Reserve Holds Interest Rates Steady in Jerome Powell’s Final Meeting as Fed Chair
Why It Matters
The Federal Reserve’s decision to hold interest rates steady for a third consecutive meeting has direct consequences for American households and businesses nationwide, including those in Idaho, where borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and small business financing remain tied to the Fed’s benchmark rate. With economic uncertainty driven in part by the ongoing U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, the path forward for interest rates remains unclear — and that uncertainty affects every corner of the country.
What Happened
The Federal Reserve voted on Wednesday to keep its benchmark lending rate unchanged in a range of 3.5% to 3.75%, marking the third consecutive meeting in which policymakers opted to hold steady. The decision came during what was Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s final meeting leading the central bank before his term expires on May 15.
Powell confirmed at a post-meeting news conference that he will step aside as chair but will remain on the Fed’s board. He is serving a concurrent term as a Fed governor that runs through January 2028, making him the first Fed chair to remain on the board since 1948.
Powell cited the ongoing conflict in the Middle East as a key source of uncertainty shaping the Fed’s cautious posture. “We’re kind of waiting to see what happens with events in the Middle East and what are the implications of those events for the US economy,” Powell said. The Fed’s policy statement acknowledged that “developments in the Middle East are contributing to a high level of uncertainty about the economic outlook.”
By the Numbers
- 3.5%–3.75% — the Fed’s current benchmark lending rate range, held steady for the third consecutive meeting
- 4 dissenting votes — the most of any kind since October 1992, reflecting a sharply divided rate-setting committee
- 12 voting members on the Fed’s rate-setting committee, with 6 additional non-voting participants
- May 15 — Powell’s final day as Fed chair before his term officially expires
- January 2028 — the expiration of Powell’s concurrent term as a Fed governor
A Divided Committee
Wednesday’s vote was nearly unanimous, but the dissents were notable. Fed Governor Stephen Miran voted in favor of lower rates for the sixth consecutive meeting. Meanwhile, three regional Fed bank presidents — Beth Hammack of Cleveland, Neel Kashkari of Minneapolis, and Lorie Logan of Dallas — dissented in the opposite direction, declining to support language in the policy statement suggesting any easing bias.
Powell acknowledged the sharp disagreement within the committee, describing it as a “vigorous” debate. “These are really tough, difficult judgments,” he said, adding that reaching consensus among 19 strong-minded participants is an inherently difficult process. “As a soon-to-be former chair, I do understand how hard it is to get consensus,” Powell said.
The four total dissents of varying directions are the most seen at a single Fed meeting in more than three decades, underscoring just how fractured opinion has become over where monetary policy should go next.
Zoom Out
The Fed’s continued hold comes as several economic crosscurrents complicate any clear policy direction. Elevated energy prices tied to the Iran war, a stabilized but weak labor market, and continued consumer spending all make the case for rate cuts less compelling. At the same time, the incoming Fed chair is expected to favor a different approach.
Kevin Warsh, President Donald Trump’s nominee to succeed Powell, cleared a key hurdle in his Senate Banking Committee confirmation process earlier Wednesday. Warsh is widely expected to favor additional rate cuts, though the committee’s current divisions suggest he will face significant internal resistance. His nomination now advances to the full Senate for a final vote. Congressional dynamics have complicated other key federal policy decisions this year as well, adding further uncertainty to the economic outlook.
Powell also addressed the possibility of a Justice Department investigation into testimony he gave to Congress last year regarding a renovation project at the central bank’s headquarters. He said he would leave his governor role only when he believes it is appropriate, and that he is “waiting for the investigation to be well and truly over with finality and transparency.”
What’s Next
Powell’s tenure as Fed chair formally ends May 15. Warsh’s full Senate confirmation vote is expected in the coming weeks. Once confirmed, Warsh will inherit a deeply divided committee and a complex economic environment shaped by global conflict, sticky inflation concerns, and a cautious majority that shows little appetite for imminent rate cuts. Broader federal policy uncertainty continues to ripple across multiple areas of government as the Trump administration navigates a range of domestic and international challenges.
Fed officials have signaled they are in no rush to act, with Powell emphasizing that any move — whether a cut or a hike — would require clear economic justification that the data has not yet provided.
About the Author
