Richie Diesterheft / Wikimedia Commons
Why It Matters
A federal judge in Ohio will decide next week whether 24 college basketball players can compete in a fifth season under NCAA rules, potentially affecting how the governing body enforces newly tightened eligibility standards. The ruling could set a precedent as similar lawsuits proceed in other states over the NCAA’s restructured competition model.
What Happened
Judge Christopher Wagner scheduled a written ruling for July 9 on a preliminary injunction request filed by the 24 athletes, who graduated high school in 2022 and began playing college basketball that fall without redshirting. The plaintiffs argue that the NCAA’s new age-based eligibility framework unfairly excludes them from competing in a fifth season during the upcoming fall schedule.
Wagner previously rejected a temporary restraining order request shortly after the lawsuit was filed, and a hearing occurred earlier this week ahead of the July 9 deadline.
The NCAA Division I Cabinet approved the eligibility rule change last month. Under the new model, athletes can compete in five seasons of play within a five-year window starting from either full-time enrollment or the academic year following their 19th birthday, whichever comes first. The previous system allowed four years of competition over five years.
The new rules take effect this fall. Under the revised framework, injury-related extensions are no longer available except for athletes pursuing religious missions, pregnant athletes, or those on active-duty military service. Athletes whose eligibility already expired by spring 2026 under the traditional model cannot compete in a fifth year under the new rules—a provision that affects the 24 plaintiffs in this case.
The Plaintiffs’ Argument
Attorney Ryan Downton, representing the basketball players, stated that “each plaintiff was harmed each time he or she competed in a basketball game against a fifth or sixth-year player without being offered the same opportunity to compete in a fifth season themselves.”
The athletes contend that the NCAA’s retroactive application of the new eligibility restrictions creates an unfair competitive disadvantage for players who were not grandfathered into the fifth-year opportunity.
NCAA’s Position
The NCAA Division I Cabinet has signaled it does not intend to change course on the new eligibility rules. The organization has maintained that the restructured model applies uniformly across the membership, with limited exceptions.
What’s Next
Wagner’s July 9 ruling will determine whether the 24 players can secure a preliminary injunction—a court order that would allow them to compete in the fifth season pending the full resolution of their lawsuit. Similar legal challenges to the age-eligibility rule are being filed in multiple states, suggesting the issue could reach higher courts.
The outcome in Ohio could influence how federal judges in other jurisdictions handle comparable eligibility disputes.
About the Author
