Wyoming’s Forgotten Corner-Crossing Case: How One Hunter’s Fight Helped Open Millions of Acres of Western Public Land
Why It Matters
For hunters, hikers, and outdoor enthusiasts across Wyoming and five other Western states, access to millions of acres of public land hinges on a legal principle tested and contested over decades in courtrooms and wilderness terrain. The story of how that access was won traces back not to a celebrated legal team or a major advocacy organization — but to a lone Wyoming hunter who refused to pay a $250 trespass ticket in 2003.
As public land access remains a defining issue across the Mountain West, the legal groundwork laid in an Albany County, Wyoming courtroom more than two decades ago continues to shape what Americans can and cannot do on lands they collectively own.
What Happened
William Francis “Bill” Kearney IV, a hunter and environmental science professional who had relocated from New York to work for the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, was cited on September 3, 2003, by a Wyoming Game and Fish warden for allegedly hunting on private land without permission near the Laramie Peak area.
The citation stemmed from a practice known as corner crossing — stepping from one parcel of public land to another where two public and two private parcels meet at a single point in a checkerboard pattern. Corner crossers do not set foot on private land, but they pass through the airspace above the corner of private property. Ranch owners and Game and Fish officials long held that this constituted trespassing, citing the common law principle that a landowner’s rights extend from the earth’s center to the sky above.
Kearney, who had used a GPS device to locate a surveyor’s monument marking the common corner, refused to accept the citation. According to his friend Dennis Brown, Kearney told officials, “I’ll see you in court, I’m not paying this.” On March 25, 2004, Albany County Circuit Judge Robert Castor found Kearney not guilty following a bench trial — a ruling that would quietly set a legal precedent for years to come.
The Man Behind the Case
Kearney studied watershed and wildlife science at Utah State University before joining Wyoming’s state government in Cheyenne in the early 1980s. He became a skilled and disciplined hunter, known for studying topographic maps and leveraging his background in wildlife biology to locate trophy elk in the Laramie Range.
According to Brown, Kearney consistently pursued elk in areas where checkerboard public and private ownership made access legally ambiguous. “He knew where to find big, massive elk,” Brown said in remarks reported by WyoFile. “He probably killed eight or 10 of the biggest bulls you could ever imagine.” Kearney died in 2018 at the age of 62. His local obituary noted he was “well-known for his corner-jumping incident.”
By the Numbers
- Kearney’s original trespass citation was issued on September 3, 2003, and he was acquitted on March 25, 2004.
- The corner-crossing legal principle, once established, now affects public land access across six Western states.
- The original trespass ticket Kearney refused to pay was approximately $250.
- Kearney spent approximately two decades hunting the Laramie Peak area and reportedly harvested eight to ten trophy bull elk using a bow.
- Kearney’s acquittal came 23 years before the more widely publicized “Missouri Four” corner-crossing cases drew national attention.
Zoom Out
Kearney’s 2004 acquittal remained largely obscure for nearly two decades until four Missouri hunters — now known as the “Missouri Four” — were cited for corner crossing in Wyoming and chose to contest both criminal charges and a subsequent civil lawsuit. Aided by the Wyoming chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, the four men won acquittal on criminal charges in April 2022 and ultimately prevailed in the civil case, which reached the U.S. Supreme Court before a final resolution.
The outcome of those cases is now widely credited with opening millions of acres of public land across the West to hunters and recreationists. Advocates who followed the more recent litigation, however, point to Kearney’s earlier case as the foundational legal moment — a decision that broke trail long before others passed through. Wyoming lawmakers have separately grappled with other public land disputes, including a $3 million allocation to resolve a conflict over Hot Springs State Park, underscoring the ongoing tension between public access rights and competing private and governmental interests across the state.
What’s Next
With the legal standing of corner crossing now substantially reinforced through both the Kearney precedent and the Missouri Four litigation, land access advocates are expected to push for broader recognition of the practice across the remaining Western states where checkerboard land ownership creates similar access barriers. Other Wyoming policy debates — including housing and budget priorities — continue alongside land access issues as state officials weigh competing demands on public resources.
For now, the legacy of a Douglas, Wyoming hunter who refused to pay a misdemeanor fine stands as a quiet but consequential chapter in the ongoing fight over who gets to use the American West’s vast public lands.
About the Author
