Helena, Montana City Commission Deadlocked on Immigration Policy Next Steps as Attorney General Vows Legal Challenge
Why It Matters
The standoff in Helena’s city government over its immigration enforcement resolution has left residents and commissioners without a clear path forward — and Montana taxpayers on the hook for a growing legal bill. With Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen vowing to challenge any new ordinance the city adopts, Helena faces a choice between continued government spending on litigation or abandoning a policy that drew significant public support when it was first passed.
The situation also carries broader implications for other Montana municipalities that may be weighing similar policies, as Knudsen has made clear his office will scrutinize any locality that attempts to limit local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
What Happened
The Helena City Commission revealed Monday evening that private consultations between individual commissioners and outside legal counsel had produced no consensus on how to move forward with a revised immigration resolution — leaving the city’s next steps entirely uncertain.
City Attorney Rebecca Dockter told commissioners that each member had met separately with Missoula attorney Natasha Jones — the city’s outside legal counsel — to avoid triggering public meeting requirements. After those private discussions, Dockter said no majority of commissioners agreed on a recommended course of action. “There is no action planned at this time,” Dockter told the commission, adding that there is “no deadline, no statute of limitations” on any future steps.
The announcement drew frustration from Commissioner Melinda Reed, who said it was “not clear” that commissioners were expected to weigh in on next steps during their individual meetings with Jones. Reed said she had expected that discussion to happen publicly during Monday’s meeting, and called the process a disappointment. She indicated she would seek support from at least two other commissioners to force a public discussion at a future city meeting.
The commission had voted in March to rescind its original immigration resolution — which directed the Helena Police Department to avoid assisting federal immigration enforcement, withhold information about individuals’ immigration status, and prohibit federal officers from wearing masks during operations in the city. Commissioners also voted at that time to revise the resolution and invite input from the attorney general’s office.
Knudsen rejected that invitation. In an April written response, the attorney general stated: “Although I appreciate the City’s offer to work together on its next foray into immigration matters, it rests upon a fundamental misunderstanding about Montana law and the role of the Attorney General.” Knudsen added that compliance with Montana’s anti-sanctuary city law “is not a collaborative enterprise” and warned that his office would evaluate any new ordinance for legal compliance, with the implication that litigation would follow.
By the Numbers
- Approximately $100,000 spent by the city on the immigration resolution to date, according to Commissioner Sean Logan
- 3 out of 5 commissioners needed to form a majority and agree on next steps — a threshold not reached in private consultations
- The commission voted in March 2026 to rescind its original resolution
- Knudsen issued his written rejection of collaboration in April 2026
- 2 commissioner votes needed to place the topic on a future public meeting agenda, per Reed
Zoom Out
Montana is among several states that have passed anti-sanctuary city laws designed to ensure local governments cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. With the Trump administration ramping up immigration enforcement nationwide, the tension between progressive-leaning city commissions and state law has intensified across the Mountain West.
Commissioner Logan’s concern about mounting legal fees reflects a practical fiscal reality. “Anything moving forward is gonna be litigious, and consequently, there’s going to be more legal fees associated with it,” Logan said. “I’m just not comfortable spending more money.” That sentiment echoes broader debates in Montana about the appropriate use of taxpayer funds by local governments and whether municipal leaders are stepping outside their proper roles.
Knudsen’s firm stance signals that the attorney general’s office intends to serve as an enforcement mechanism against local policies that conflict with state law — a posture consistent with the state’s conservative leadership and its alignment with the federal administration’s immigration priorities.
What’s Next
Commissioner Reed has pledged to seek support from at least two colleagues to bring the immigration policy discussion back before the public at an upcoming city meeting. Mayor Emily Dean declined to detail the legal options presented by outside counsel, citing attorney-client privilege and the need to protect the city’s legal position.
Whether a majority of commissioners will agree to revisit the resolution publicly — or quietly let the matter drop given the financial and legal risks — remains to be seen. For now, Helena’s immigration policy question remains unresolved, with no timeline set for a decision.
About the Author
